Editorial policy

Last updated: September 29, 2026

A useful page must help a player make a decision, explain a mechanic, or show evidence they cannot get from a title and an image alone.

Sources and claims

Official Roblox APIs and developer announcements support player counts, public metadata and announced changes. Community wikis support game-specific facts when linked and attributed. Community estimates, asking prices, completed-sale averages and measured player counts are different kinds of evidence; we label them separately.

We do not treat a game update timestamp as patch notes, infer an item’s drop rate from its rarity, or turn a traffic increase into proof of an update’s success. Advice derived from a calculation is presented as an inference, with its inputs and assumptions available to readers.

Original work and automation

Our original contribution includes historical measurements, comparisons, explanatory guides and interactive planning tools. Scheduled data reports are generated from validated observations and carry an automation disclosure, a measurement window and source links. They are skipped when coverage or change is insufficient. A publishing schedule is not a reason to invent news.

Automated source checks preserve the last valid content when a source fails or a proposed change loses important information. A failed check is not a new verification. Newly discovered records are held for validation; placeholders do not automatically become indexable articles. Summaries of patch notes must retain attribution and distinguish confirmed changes from interpretation.

Quality and search

Search eligibility requires useful explanation or enough structured evidence to support comparisons. Empty sections, decorative images and a recent timestamp do not supply that substance. Incomplete records may remain accessible through a category while excluded from search and advertising. We review quality states on a schedule as content changes.

Dates, authorship and corrections

A publication date records when an article was released. A verification date records a successful source check, not merely the last job run. Automated reports use the byline Bloxism Data Desk and identify their generation method; they do not claim a human reviewed each result. Editorial pages name their author or Bloxism when authored collectively.

Use an article’s correction controls or contact us with supporting evidence. Approved changes keep an audit trail. Older guides can remain useful, but readers should compare their verification date with the game’s latest update before relying on a time-sensitive number.

Commercial independence

Ads are labelled and separated from controls. Advertising does not buy a higher measured ranking or a favorable recommendation. We do not manufacture reviews, user activity, trading demand or scarcity. See methodology for calculations and advertising disclosure for placements.